Workshop Aims and Scope
Both search and recommendation algorithms provide a user with a ranking that aims to match their needs and interests. Despite the (non) personalized perspective characterizing each class of algorithms, both learn patterns from historical data, which conveys biases in terms of imbalances and inequalities.
In most cases, the trained models and, by extension, the final ranking, unfortunately strengthen these biases in the learned patterns. When a bias impacts on human beings as individuals or as groups with certain legally protected characteristics (e.g., race, gender), the inequalities reinforced by search and recommendation algorithms lead to severe societal consequences like discrimination and unfairness.
Challenges that arise in the real-world applications are focused, among others, on controlling the effects generated by popularity bias to improve the user's perceived quality of the results, supporting consumers and providers with fair rankings, and transparently explaining why a model provides a given (less) biased result. Hence, being able to detect, measure, characterize, and mitigate bias while keeping high effectiveness is a prominent and timely challenge.
BIAS 2021 will be the ECIR's workshop aimed at collecting new contributions in this emerging field and providing a common ground for interested researchers and practitioners. Specifically, BIAS 2021 will be the second edition of this dedicated event at ECIR, coming after a very successful 2020 delivering. Given the growing interest of the community in these topics, we expect that this workshop will be more and more of interest, with a stronger outcome and a wider community dialog.
The workshop welcomes contributions in all topics related to algorithmic biasand fairness in search and recommendation, focused (but not limited) to:
- Data Set Collection and Preparation:
- Managing imbalances and inequalities within data sets
- Devising collection pipelines that lead to fair and unbiased data sets
- Collecting data sets useful for studying potential biased and unfair situations
- Designing procedures for creating data sets for research on bias and fairness
- Countermeasure Design and Development:
- Conducting exploratory analysis that uncover biases
- Designing treatments that mitigate biases (e.g., popularity bias)
- Devising interpretable search and recommendation models
- Providing treatment procedures whose outcomes are easily interpretable
- Balancing inequalities among different groups of users or stakeholders
- Evaluation Protocol and Metric Formulation:
- Conducting quantitative experimental studies on bias and unfairness
- Defining objective metrics that consider fairness and/or bias
- Formulating bias-aware protocols to evaluate existing algorithms
- Evaluating existing strategies in unexplored domains
- Comparative studies of existing evaluation protocols and strategies
- Case Study Exploration:
- E-commerce platforms
- Educational environments
- Entertainment websites
- Healthcare systems
- Social media
- News platforms
- Digital libraries
- Job portals
- Dating platforms
- Submissions: January 4, 2021
- Notifications: February 8, 2021
- Camera-Ready: March 1, 2021
- Workshop: March 28, 2021 - ONLINE EVENT
All deadlines are 11:59pm, AoE time (Anywhere on Earth).
All submissions must be written in English. Authors should consult ECIR paper guidelines and Fuhr’s guide to avoid common IR evaluation mistakes, for the preparation of their papers. Authors should consult Springer’s authors’ guidelines and use their proceedings templates, either LaTeX or Word. Papers should be submitted as PDF files to Easychair at https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=bias2021. Please be aware that at least one author per paper needs to register and attend the workshop to present the work.
We will consider three different submission types:
- Full papers (12 pages) should be clearly placed with respect to the state of the art and state the contribution of the proposal in the domain of application, even if presenting preliminary results. In particular, research papers should describe the methodology in detail, experiments should be repeatable, and a comparison with the existing approaches in the literature should be made.
- Reproducibility papers (12 pages) should repeat prior experiments using the original source code and datasets to show how, why, and when the methods work or not (replicability papers) or should repeat prior experiments, preferably using the original source code, in new contexts (e.g., different domains and datasets, different evaluation and metrics) to further generalize and validate or not previous work (reproducibility papers).
- Short or position papers (6 pages) should introduce new point of views in the workshop topics or summarize the experience of a group in the field. Practice and experience reports should present in detail real-world scenarios in which search and recommender systems are exploited.
Submissions should not exceed the indicated number of pages, including any diagrams and references.
The reviewing process will be coordinated by the organizers. Each paper will receive two reviews external to the organizing committee and one review internal to it, according to reviewers' expertise.
The accepted papers and the material generated during the meeting will be available on the workshop website. The workshop proceedings will be also published in a volume, whose details will be given soon, and indexed on DBLP and Scopus. Authors of selected papers may be invited to submit an extended version in a journal special issue.
- Opening Remarks. Duration: 5 minutes.
- Keynote speaker 1 (Academic). Duration: 40 minutes.
- Spot thematic session 1. Duration: 40 minutes.
- Coffee break. Duration: 20 minutes.
- Spot thematic sessions 2 and 3. Duration: 80 minutes.
- Lunch break. Duration 2 hours.
- Keynote speaker 2 (Industry). Duration: 40 minutes.
- Spot thematic session 4. Duration: 40 minutes.
- Coffee break. Duration: 20 minutes.
- Panel + Open discussion. Duration: 50 minutes.
- Concluding remarks. Duration: 5 minutes.
For general enquiries on the workshop, please send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, and email@example.com.