Workshop Aims and Scope
Both search and recommendation algorithms provide a user with a ranking that aims to match their needs and interests. Despite the (non) personalized perspective characterizing each class of algorithms, both learn patterns from historical data, which conveys biases in terms of imbalances and inequalities.
In most cases, the trained models and, by extension, the final ranking, unfortunately strengthen these biases in the learned patterns. When a bias impacts on human beings as individuals or as groups with certain legally protected characteristics (e.g., race, gender), the inequalities reinforced by search and recommendation algorithms lead to severe societal consequences like discrimination and unfairness.
Challenges that arise in the real-world applications are focused, among others, on controlling the effects generated by popularity bias to improve the user's perceived quality of the results, supporting consumers and providers with fair rankings, and transparently explaining why a model provides a given (less) biased result. Hence, being able to detect, measure, characterize, and mitigate bias while keeping high effectiveness is a prominent and timely challenge.
BIAS 2021 will be the ECIR's workshop aimed at collecting new contributions in this emerging field and providing a common ground for interested researchers and practitioners. Specifically, BIAS 2021 will be the second edition of this dedicated event at ECIR, coming after a very successful 2020 delivering. Given the growing interest of the community in these topics, we expect that this workshop will be more and more of interest, with a stronger outcome and a wider community dialog.
The workshop welcomes contributions in all topics related to algorithmic biasand fairness in search and recommendation, focused (but not limited) to:
- Data Set Collection and Preparation:
- Managing imbalances and inequalities within data sets
- Devising collection pipelines that lead to fair and unbiased data sets
- Collecting data sets useful for studying potential biased and unfair situations
- Designing procedures for creating data sets for research on bias and fairness
- Countermeasure Design and Development:
- Conducting exploratory analysis that uncover biases
- Designing treatments that mitigate biases (e.g., popularity bias)
- Devising interpretable search and recommendation models
- Providing treatment procedures whose outcomes are easily interpretable
- Balancing inequalities among different groups of users or stakeholders
- Evaluation Protocol and Metric Formulation:
- Conducting quantitative experimental studies on bias and unfairness
- Defining objective metrics that consider fairness and/or bias
- Formulating bias-aware protocols to evaluate existing algorithms
- Evaluating existing strategies in unexplored domains
- Comparative studies of existing evaluation protocols and strategies
- Case Study Exploration:
- E-commerce platforms
- Educational environments
- Entertainment websites
- Healthcare systems
- Social media
- News platforms
- Digital libraries
- Job portals
- Dating platforms
January 4, 2021January 11, 2021
February 8, 2021February 15, 2021
March 1, 2021March 15, 2021
- Workshop: April 1, 2021 - ONLINE EVENT
All deadlines are 11:59pm, AoE time (Anywhere on Earth).
All submissions must be written in English. Authors should consult ECIR paper guidelines and Fuhr’s guide to avoid common IR evaluation mistakes, for the preparation of their papers. Authors should consult Springer’s authors’ guidelines and use their proceedings templates, either LaTeX or Word. Papers should be submitted as PDF files to Easychair at https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=bias2021. Please be aware that at least one author per paper needs to register and attend the workshop to present the work.
We will consider three different submission types:
- Full papers (12 pages) should be clearly placed with respect to the state of the art and state the contribution of the proposal in the domain of application, even if presenting preliminary results. In particular, research papers should describe the methodology in detail, experiments should be repeatable, and a comparison with the existing approaches in the literature should be made.
- Reproducibility papers (12 pages) should repeat prior experiments using the original source code and datasets to show how, why, and when the methods work or not (replicability papers) or should repeat prior experiments, preferably using the original source code, in new contexts (e.g., different domains and datasets, different evaluation and metrics) to further generalize and validate or not previous work (reproducibility papers).
- Short or position papers (6 pages) should introduce new point of views in the workshop topics or summarize the experience of a group in the field. Practice and experience reports should present in detail real-world scenarios in which search and recommender systems are exploited.
Submissions should not exceed the indicated number of pages, including any diagrams and references.
The reviewing process will be coordinated by the organizers. Each paper will receive three reviews from the programme committee, according to reviewers' expertise.
The accepted papers and the material generated during the meeting will be available on the workshop website. The workshop proceedings will be also published as a Springer's Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS) revised post-proceedings volume, and indexed on Google Scholar, DBLP and Scopus. Authors of selected papers may be invited to submit an extended version in a journal special issue.
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Spain)
Title: Fairness and Transparency in Ranking
Abstract: Ranking in Information Retrieval (IR) has been traditionally evaluated from the perspective of the relevance of search engine results to people searching for information, i.e., the extent to which the system provides "the right information, to the right people, in the right way, at the right time." However, people in current IR systems are not only the ones issuing search queries, but increasingly they are also the ones being searched. This raises several new problems in IR that have been addressed in recent research, particularly with respect to fairness/non-discrimination, accountability, and transparency.
Short Bio: Carlos Castillo is a Distinguished Research Professor at Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, where he leads the Web Science and Social Computing research group. He is a web miner with a background on information retrieval, and has been influential in the areas of crisis informatics, web content quality and credibility, and adversarial web search. He is a prolific, highly cited researcher who has co-authored over 80 publications in top-tier international conferences and journals, receiving a test-of-time award, four best paper awards, and two best student paper awards. His works include a book on Big Crisis Data, as well as monographs on Information and Influence Propagation, and Adversarial Web Search.
Slides: Download here
Due to the ongoing worldwide COVID-19 situation, the BIAS@ECIR2021 workshop will take place online on April 1, 2021, 09:00-16:30, CEST. To participate, you need to register to the ECIR conference. Once registered, you will receive by e-mail further details on how to join the workshop.
|09:00 09:05||Welcome Message|
|09:05 10:00||Keynote Talk on Fairness and Transparency in Ranking by Carlos Castillo (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)|
Paper Session I (short introduction)
|10:30 11:00||Coffee Break|
Paper Session II (short introduction)
|13:00 14:10||Lunch Break|
Paper Session III (short introduction)
|16:15 16:30||Discussion and Concluding Remarks|
- Ludovico Boratto, Eurecat - Centre Tecnológic de Catalunya (Spain)
- Stefano Faralli, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome (Italy)
- Mirko Marras, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL (Switzerland)
- Giovanni Stilo, University of L’Aquila (Italy)
- Himan Abdollahpouri, Northwestern University (United States)
- Luca Maria Aiello, Nokia Bell Labs (United Kingdom)
- Mehwish Alam, FIZ-Karlsruhe & KIT (Germany)
- Marcelo Gabriel Armentano, ISISTAN Research Institute CONICET-UNCPBA (Argentina)
- Alejandro Bellogin, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (Spain)
- Bettina Berendt, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium)
- Glencora Borradaile, Oregon State University (United States)
- Federica Cena, University of Turin (Italy)
- Jeffrey Chen, RMIT University (Australia)
- Pasquale De Meo, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (The Netherlands)
- Sarah Dean, University of California Berkeley (United States)
- Danilo Dessì, FIZ-Karlsruhe & KIT (Germany)
- Michael Ekstrand, Boise State University (United States)
- Francesco Fabbri, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Spain)
- Jean Garcia-Gathright, Spotify (United States)
- Aniko Hannak, Northeaster University (United States)
- Nina Grgic-Hlaca, MPI-SWS (Germany)
- Genet Asefa Gesese, FIZ-Karlsruhe (Germany)
- Toshihiro Kamishima, AIST (Japan)
- Martha Larson, Radboud University and TU Delft (The Netherlands)
- Aonghus Lawlor, University College Dublin (Ireland)
- Sandy Mayson, University of Georgia (United States)
- Rishabh Mehrotra, Spotify (United Kingdom)
- Brent Mittelstadt, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
- Cataldo Musto, University of Bari (Italy)
- Panagiotis Papadakos, Information Systems Laboratory - FORTH-ICS (Greece)
- Mykola Pechenizkiy, Eindhoven University of Technology (The Netherlands)
- Simone Paolo Ponzetto, University of Mannheim (Germany)
- Elissa Redmiles, MPI-SWS (Germany)
- Flora D. Salim, RMIT University (Australia)
- Ruofei Shen, Facebook (United States)
- Damiano Spina, RMIT University (Australia)
- Antonela Tommasel, ISISTAN Research Institute CONICET-UNCPBA (Argentina)
- Joris van Hoboken, University of Amsterdam (The Netherlands)
- Kyle Williams, Microsoft (United States)
- Eva Zangerle, University of Innsbruck (Austria)
- Markus Zanker, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (Italy)
- Meike Zehlike, MPI-SWS(Germany)
- Dong Zhou, Hunan University of Science and Technology (China)
- Arkaitz Zubiaga, Queen Mary University of London (United Kingdom)
We also invite you to check out previous editions of our similar workshops:
For general enquiries on the workshop, please send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, and email@example.com.